Well, this could get interesting.

No Politics.
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by nicolas10 »

callmeslick wrote:...but the Founders expressly tried to both avoid any over links to the Government, and before that was established, were very open to a host of religions on these shores.
Exactly, because: "And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's."

Dumbass.

Nic
Image
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by nicolas10 »

callmeslick wrote:Now, France has a different history, and has been far more culturally homogeneous for the past millenium or so, right to the end of WW II. However, they, too had a need for large-scale immigration(most Euro nations did) due to the population depletion from two World Wars. What Nic observes, along with many others throughout Europe, is the fact that it took several decades after that initial rush of immigrants for the beginnings of assimilation to occur, and it isn't an easy process. Not surprisingly, Nic sees sinister plots in this.....I don't. I just see human nature at work.
This bit here shows how little you understand the issues with immigration in France.

Originally people from north africa came to work in france a few years, send money back and then moved back. The bulk of the immigration happened way after the 50s and 60s, after there was double digit unemployment rates, because of the "loi de regroupement familial" which was voted IIRC around 74, when there was absolutely no need for foreign workers anymore. But even then never did as many migrants come in france as under sarkozy only a few years back, and nowadays... french people don't vote right so they need to add more migrants. Oh and they're trying to give the right to vote to foreigners who live in France now.
Image
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by callmeslick »

what is wrong with any residents voting, Nic? In the US, any resident could vote here until around 1910, whether they were a citizen or not. It worked well.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:what is wrong with any residents voting, Nic? In the US, any resident could vote here until around 1910, whether they were a citizen or not. It worked well.
This is one of the top ten most stupid things...you've ever said/written here. :roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by callmeslick »

except, it is factually true, Pud. You didn't have to be a US citizen to vote in US elections in the late 19th century.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
HappyHappy

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by HappyHappy »

callmeslick wrote:except, it is factually true, Pud. You didn't have to be a US citizen to vote in US elections in the late 19th century.

But you are still obviously stupid.

HH
Pudfark

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:except, it is factually true, Pud. You didn't have to be a US citizen to vote in US elections in the late 19th century.
Didn't have to have a photo I.D.....either. :lol:
With statements like that quoted above....we've definitely gone from a nation of "immigrants" to a nation of "ignorants"/"ignorance".

Yup, looking back at yer described "good old days"....the time when some folks had a "vacum cleaner" named "Tyrone" and he wasn't allowed to vote...though, he was allowed to "reside". Then later on...he was allowed to pay a "poll tax". Then after that, he was allowed to sell his vote in exchange fer "freebies" promised by the Democrats. So, ya advocate...going "full circle"?

:roll:
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by callmeslick »

nicolas10 wrote:
callmeslick wrote:...but the Founders expressly tried to both avoid any over links to the Government, and before that was established, were very open to a host of religions on these shores.
Exactly, because: "And he said unto them, Render therefore unto Caesar the things which be Caesar's, and unto God the things which be God's."

Dumbass.

Nic
actually, that had NOTHING to do with the matter.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:except, it is factually true, Pud. You didn't have to be a US citizen to vote in US elections in the late 19th century.
:lol: Oh? The good old days...."flash mob" voting......that sorta thing went out with lynching...or? Do ya advocate that too?

Old Pudfark sez: " Sorta like hand n glove and neck n noose.... "
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: Well, this could get interesting.

Post by nicolas10 »

callmeslick wrote:actually, that had NOTHING to do with the matter.
lol

Nic
Image
Post Reply