done, Res, and might I add that Pud ALWAYS attacks the messenger. That was my beef in this thread. About 14 posts about the guy who wrote the article and no evidence of ever checking the facts the writer cited, nor the links to them. Pathetic, but it got DH to chime in, and got me a new sig!
w00t!!!!!
reality check
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
-
Pudfark
Re: reality check
Here's an example of your 'messenger'.... 
Do your own fact checking Slip...in this thread, all ya had to do was check the author's cred's first.
Fact checking and lying are the black and white of your disinformation.
DH didn't read the complete thread...by all means, use his out of context quote.
Old Pudfark sez: " Yup...currently that 'reality check' is being waived/waved around...wait until ya try to cash it. "
Do your own fact checking Slip...in this thread, all ya had to do was check the author's cred's first.
Fact checking and lying are the black and white of your disinformation.
DH didn't read the complete thread...by all means, use his out of context quote.
Old Pudfark sez: " Yup...currently that 'reality check' is being waived/waved around...wait until ya try to cash it. "
-
Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: reality check
Dream on, Pud!Pudfark wrote:DH didn't read the complete thread...by all means, use his out of context quote.
-
Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: reality check
Let's break it down.
At the time I am typing this, Pud has posted in this thread 16 times.
1 of those posts (yes, a grand total of 1) can be considered as being on subject. (it was completely unsupported, wild speculation about how Europol skews and falsifies report data) ... but at least he SAID something!
3 of the posts are nothing more than personal attacks on Slick or myself ... or both.
3 of the posts are Pud insisting that the source article of this thread is not valid and is entirely untrue solely because the article was written by a failed lawyer and an unfunny comedian. (forget the fact that some of the greatest minds in human history have failed at other endeavors ... according to Pud, if you're a shitty lawyer and comedian ... anything you write is tripe! And that's been his sole and only point in this entire thread)
The remaining 9 posts are nothing more than Pud's usual attempt at "witty" put-downs and gibberish.
Bottom line: Pud says nothing. Contributes nothing.
And while I'm at it ... let's a have a look at this:
This is just like almost everything you post in here. You think something is true just because you typed it! You just make shit up as you go, and then post it as truth.
You know what Pud? I'm pretty sure that you must be a failed lawyer and a shitty comedian ... because NOTHING you post has ANY validity!
At the time I am typing this, Pud has posted in this thread 16 times.
1 of those posts (yes, a grand total of 1) can be considered as being on subject. (it was completely unsupported, wild speculation about how Europol skews and falsifies report data) ... but at least he SAID something!
3 of the posts are nothing more than personal attacks on Slick or myself ... or both.
3 of the posts are Pud insisting that the source article of this thread is not valid and is entirely untrue solely because the article was written by a failed lawyer and an unfunny comedian. (forget the fact that some of the greatest minds in human history have failed at other endeavors ... according to Pud, if you're a shitty lawyer and comedian ... anything you write is tripe! And that's been his sole and only point in this entire thread)
The remaining 9 posts are nothing more than Pud's usual attempt at "witty" put-downs and gibberish.
Bottom line: Pud says nothing. Contributes nothing.
And while I'm at it ... let's a have a look at this:
How could you possibly know that, Pud? How could you possibly know how much of this thread DH did or did not read? Unless you PM'ed him and asked him, or you know him in real life ... how could you possibly know that?Pudfark wrote:DH didn't read the complete thread...
This is just like almost everything you post in here. You think something is true just because you typed it! You just make shit up as you go, and then post it as truth.
You know what Pud? I'm pretty sure that you must be a failed lawyer and a shitty comedian ... because NOTHING you post has ANY validity!
Last edited by Reservoir_Dog on Fri Jan 23, 2015 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: reality check
I did read the whole post, then sat back and watched the MMA style beat down. My question is what was the reason behind the post? Was it a fishing trip pulling Pud in for said beat down?
Now we have demonstrable evidence that if you try to lead from behind, eventually the guys up front will stop looking back for instructions.
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
Government-coerced expression is a feature of dictatorships that has no place in a free country
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: reality check
no, DH, it was NOT. I posted it, because the facts were worth pondering(not, you'll note, wholesale acceptance, or at least without
nuance). If I wanted to sucker Pud into saying something stupid, it wouldn't take posting anything intelligent. Frankly, he has proven
beyond doubt, that he is capable of making an ass of himself without encouragement. We just find it amusing, since no serious discourse
takes place here any more, to beat him like a pinada.
nuance). If I wanted to sucker Pud into saying something stupid, it wouldn't take posting anything intelligent. Frankly, he has proven
beyond doubt, that he is capable of making an ass of himself without encouragement. We just find it amusing, since no serious discourse
takes place here any more, to beat him like a pinada.
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: reality check
and, DH, Pud clearly thinks that EVERYONE fails at reading, when it's mostly him with the problem.
-
Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: reality check
Pud admitted in another thread that he reads too fast.callmeslick wrote:Pud clearly thinks that EVERYONE fails at reading, when it's mostly him with the problem.
I guess that explains his lack of skill when it comes to reading for comprehension.
-
callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
-
Pudfark
Re: reality check
The author of yer link holds himself out to be funny....and he is.
Y'all do the same.....and ya ain't.
That's what's funny here..your source, it's author and yer reaction.
Old Pudfark sez: " Y'all remind me of Michael Moore and Seth Rogan....recently. (just as accurate). "
Y'all do the same.....and ya ain't.
That's what's funny here..your source, it's author and yer reaction.
Old Pudfark sez: " Y'all remind me of Michael Moore and Seth Rogan....recently. (just as accurate). "