I dont invisage Michelle with one of these

No Politics.
Post Reply
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: I dont invisage Michelle with one of these

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

She was a handsome woman. :?
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: I dont invisage Michelle with one of these

Post by callmeslick »

why would the first lady need one? She has little kids around. Not so with Mrs.Roosevelt, who had remote nannies raise her kids.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: I dont invisage Michelle with one of these

Post by Pudfark »

callmeslick wrote:why would the first lady need one? She has little kids around. Not so with Mrs.Roosevelt, who had remote nannies raise her kids.
Here's the answer to your question Slip.
She had a greater sense of responsibility and a bigger pair of balls, than ewe.
The only thing 'remote' here is your inane unfounded unproven remark above.

@fats
Interesting find, thanks.
Post Reply