Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

No Politics.
Post Reply
HappyHappy

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by HappyHappy »

Ok, lets start the speculation.
It has become obvious there are 239 dead.
It's just a matter of finding the smoking/oily hole.

Seems sumptin went completely wong.

The plane, a Boeing 777 the most reliable and safest air liner ever built vanished.

Bomb?

Pilot suicide?

Massive airframe failure?

Terrorists (two stolen passports)?

Given the information at this time I suspect a person, flight crew or terrorist
flew the thing straight down into a shallow sea. The lack of a large debris field
hints at this. The Silkair suicide and value jet everglades crashes went straight in
and left little on the surface.

The Air France Airbus crash in the mid Atlantic left a lot of debris when it pancaked in.

I will start by suggesting a suicide crash.

HH
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

It's Obama's fault.
HappyHappy

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by HappyHappy »

Reservoir_Dog wrote:It's Obama's fault.
Coming from a retarded person such as yourself it makes perfect sense.

Next?

HH
fatman
Posts: 4677
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by fatman »

Not even going to speculate on a cause but the 2 dodgy passports has me leaning one way and looks like they might have found a coupe of pieces of debris near the oil slick just we will have to wait a few more hours for daylight. But i dont think this one will drag out like the air france job 30-70 meters deep flat sandy bottom
fatman
Posts: 4677
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 4:40 am

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by fatman »

And check out this pic set :o one lucky skydiver

http://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-up ... 6849766686
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

It's Hillary Clinton's fault.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by callmeslick »

It's Bill Clinton's fault.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Pudfark

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by Pudfark »

I have one hour of log able time in a 777 simulator. It was Continental Airlines 30 million dollar full size flight deck, whole front nose of a 777 simulator. The whole "exercise" was about three hours long. It included landings, take offs, both manual and automatic pilot. It's a complex, yet simple plane to fly.

Actually, the only reason it requires a pilot?
Is for "emergencies" and taxiing to the jetway.
It can be controlled/flown by radio from the ground...destinations, runway assignments changed without the pilots input.

The last I observed....the replacement overhaul of their two engines was in excess of 25,000 hours useage.

I strongly lean towards "people error" than I do mechanical error.
Like the error's...Slick and R_D made here....again.
seems funny to me...that they don't even take each other seriously and yet expect others too....
I guess they can go back to wiping their butts on the table cloth and snickering like two retards.. :roll:
HappyHappy

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by HappyHappy »

Pudfark wrote: snickering like two retards.. :roll:
Correction, Callmeshit and the Canadian moron ARE retards.

HH
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370

Post by callmeslick »

Pudfark wrote:I have one hour of log able time in a 777 simulator. It was Continental Airlines 30 million dollar full size flight deck, whole front nose of a 777 simulator. The whole "exercise" was about three hours long. It included landings, take offs, both manual and automatic pilot. It's a complex, yet simple plane to fly.

Actually, the only reason it requires a pilot?
Is for "emergencies" and taxiing to the jetway.
It can be controlled/flown by radio from the ground...destinations, runway assignments changed without the pilots input.

The last I observed....the replacement overhaul of their two engines was in excess of 25,000 hours useage.

I strongly lean towards "people error" than I do mechanical error.
Like the error's...Slick and R_D made here....again.
seems funny to me...that they don't even take each other seriously and yet expect others too....
I guess they can go back to wiping their butts on the table cloth and snickering like two retards.. :roll:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
Post Reply