What a girl!

No Politics.
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

What a girl!

Post by nicolas10 »

She has more balls than slick & res combined.

http://www.sott.net/article/273659-UK-1 ... gerprinted

Nic
Image
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: What a girl!

Post by nicolas10 »

I barely pardon the satanist signs though.

Nic
Image
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: What a girl!

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Fluoridation! Fluoridation!
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: What a girl!

Post by callmeslick »

:lol:
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: What a girl!

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Balls? No.
She has the legal right to say no under the Protection of Freedoms Act.
Hundreds of thousands of students have done it.
She's just a drama queen who wore a mask and bullshit conspiracy websites went nuts.

The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 has legislated that schools and colleges
must notify each parent of a pupil under the age of 18 if they wish to take
and subsequently use the child’s biometric data as part of an automated
biometric recognition system. As long as the child or a parent does not
object, one parent must provide written consent for a school or college to
process the child’s biometric information. A child does not have to object in
writing but a parent’s objection must be written.
Under the Act, there will never be any circumstances in which a school or
college can lawfully process a child’s biometric information (for the purposes of using an automated biometric recognition system) without one of the persons above having given written consent.
Notification sent to parents should include information about the processing
of their child’s biometric information that is sufficient to ensure that parents
are fully informed about what is being proposed. This should include: details
about the type of biometric information to be taken; how it will be used; the
parents’ and the pupil’s right to refuse or withdraw their consent; and the
school’s duty to provide reasonable alternative arrangements for those pupils
whose information cannot be processed.
Under the Act, parents and pupils can withdraw their consent at a later date,
even if they have initially agreed to the information being captured.
The pupil’s right to refuse.
The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 has legislated that if a pupil under 18
objects or refuses to participate (or to continue to participate) in activities
that involve the processing of their biometric data, the school or college must
ensure that the pupil’s biometric data are not taken/used as part of a
biometric recognition system. A pupil’s objection or refusal overrides any
parental consent to the processing. Also note:
Schools and colleges must take steps to ensure that pupils understand that
they can object or refuse to allow their biometric data to be taken/used and
that, if they do this, the school or college will have to provide them with an
alternative method of accessing relevant services. The steps taken by schools
and colleges to inform pupils should take account of their age and level of
understanding. Parents should also be told of their child’s right to object or
refuse and be encouraged to discuss this with their child.
Keep 'em coming, Nic.
You're waaaaaaaaaaay more entertaining than Pud.
Pudfark

Re: What a girl!

Post by Pudfark »

nicolas10 wrote:She has more balls than slick & res combined.

http://www.sott.net/article/273659-UK-1 ... gerprinted

Nic
I agree Nic...yes, she does...
"slick & res" combined....are a "pear". ;)

Slick pretty much summed up his mental acuity with a " :lol: "...and that's his stand on a person's "rights".

Res_dog....well...it's never his fight, much like sport's, ain't his to play...so he enjoy's watching and commenting about other's abilities....all whilst squirming...hoping folks don't notice....that all he's got to contribute...is his lip.

Good find Nic.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: What a girl!

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Pudfark wrote:Slick pretty much summed up his mental acuity with a " :lol: "...and that's his stand on a person's "rights".
He was laughing at the Fluoridation! Fluoridation! line, ya retard.
User avatar
callmeslick
Posts: 16473
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.

Re: What a girl!

Post by callmeslick »

you ever get the idea that folks tell jokes around Pud and then have to explain them to him.....two or three times?
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am I live in Texas....you live in America.
User avatar
Reservoir_Dog
Posts: 8858
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.

Re: What a girl!

Post by Reservoir_Dog »

Yup. He must be the life of the party. :lol:
User avatar
nicolas10
Posts: 1847
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:26 pm

Re: What a girl!

Post by nicolas10 »

So they're teaching children how to be fingerprinted like cattle, they're forcing people who hop on planes to get used to be searched. I won't be surprised when the search people who board trains in the not so far future.

A few weeks back, I don't remember where, I stumbled on a children book where the character found it throughly amusing to be searched at the airport.

In discos around here it's all the rage to get a RFID chip inserted in your arm so you can go in and out at will.

1984 will be a piece of cake, really.

Nic
Image
Post Reply