callmeslick wrote:wow, and I didn't get a copy of that one!!!
You wouldn't have been able to comprehend it any way...not that you were ever on the list...
See my very next post...underneath this one for the comprehension thingy...
The link in my first post of this thread...once again, quite obviously you didn't read or comprehend, per usual. No Where In It does it mention Benghazi. What it did mention/quote "discussing the possibility of impeaching Obama for one of his numerous instances of presidential misconduct." No mention of any specific conduct. However, ya got a good list going and many here would applaud yer efforts to add to it.
I truly find it laughable...ya got past the 8th grade. You don't do your homework, pay attention, proof read what ya write and yer predictable. You hold yerself out to be "better" than that...how's about showing some of it? This country boy wouldn't mind seeing some of that...
CUDA wrote:I think the irony is that the Democrats known that obama has commited impeachable offenses in the first place
actually, if you read the thrust of the email, it shows just the opposite. They are asking to raise funds to ensure that the Congress has less obstructionists bent on silly stuff like impeachment and 20 votes to repeal a law that isn't getting repealed, and replacing them with people willing to move forward. Pretty standard campaign fare, although I never got the email, and am working only from the description in the linked article.
Pudfark wrote: Mon May 29, 2017 11:15 am
I live in Texas....you live in America.
CUDA wrote:I think the irony is that the Democrats known that obama has commited impeachable offenses in the first place
actually, if you read the thrust of the email, it shows just the opposite. They are asking to raise funds to ensure that the Congress has less obstructionists bent on silly stuff like impeachment and 20 votes to repeal a law that isn't getting repealed, and replacing them with people willing to move forward. Pretty standard campaign fare, although I never got the email, and am working only from the description in the linked article.
Seems likely...if yer first two posts are representative of the "average democrat"....they missed it as well.
Glad you felt my "thrust" and responded.
It'll be interesting...in the "aftermath"...if ya'll will go full term..or..opt for the the "morning after" pill...?
Either way? The next few weeks will be interesting and the next 2-3 months...frightening, for everybody.
It's sorta like an untended blister...on the rise...ya can prick it...or just suffer and let it burst...