You sank a long time ago.Pudfark wrote:No thin Ice. Here, ya either sink or swim.
PBS, BBC, CSPANPudfark wrote:Please name me one "un-biased" news source in the U.S.?
You lose.
You sank a long time ago.Pudfark wrote:No thin Ice. Here, ya either sink or swim.
PBS, BBC, CSPANPudfark wrote:Please name me one "un-biased" news source in the U.S.?
You're pathetic.Pudfark wrote:Like uh..uh..? What is the "BBC"....
![]()
Nobody watches CSPAN...not even the libs.![]()
PBS...really? The armpit of OBAMA....![]()
Whut I thought...other'n ya didn't mention "looney tunes".
Not to fret...Alec Baldwin is getting a show on MSNBC.
Reservoir_Dog wrote:He constantly does that.Barfly wrote:If you wanted honest debate, which you are probably capable of, you could present your positions in a logical fashion, provide factual support, attack other's arguments in an honest way.
What he gets in return is two dimensional political thinking filled with Fox news sound bites and daily "buzz" phrases on top of endless links to completely bias ultra right wing articles that the posters (you know who you are) take as gospel simply because they'll believe any amount of crap that their puppet masters shove down their throat because thinking for themselves is apparently too hard.
Any wonder why he posts less.
It ain't about gaining traction.
Pud's ice is pretty thin.
You are the only one seeing it.callmeslick wrote:I see my point is made.