Page 1 of 1

So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:27 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
After all that endless ranting you did over Benghazi ... how do you feel about your guy Trump getting a bunch of civilians, women and children killed?
What are your thoughts on this?
US military officials told Reuters that Trump approved his first covert counterterrorism operation without sufficient intelligence, ground support or adequate backup preparations.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/ ... auguration
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-38848297
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-t ... SKBN15G5RX
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/raid-in-yem ... da-attack/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02 ... -military/

Re: So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:09 pm
by Darkhorse
Reservoir_Dog wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2017 5:27 pm After all that endless ranting you did over Benghazi ... how do you feel about your guy Trump getting a bunch of civilians, women and children killed?
What are your thoughts on this?
First off comparing the two is disingenuous and you know it! When these dirt bags hide amongst the civilian population unfortunate things will happen and if you think for on minute that the warriors sent on this mission indiscriminately killed women and children your a bigger piece of shit than HH says you are! Most of those women were most likely combatants and it's on them not us that they have children with them! When some un-named source makes claims to uneducated biased reporters before the Military sorts things out and you think everything you read is accurate your an idiot!

Re: So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:39 pm
by callmeslick
whole lotta supposition and assumption there, DH, that I NEVER recall given to Obama. Thanks for showing the true patriotic colors, in one post!

Re: So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:44 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Darkhorse wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:09 pmthese dirt bags hide amongst the civilian population unfortunate things will happen
Yes, those dirt bags hide among the civilian population. But is that not something that should be taken into consideration before ordering an attack? And if was, why did they still order the attack? Was the collateral damage deemed acceptable? Who in the room was saying, "The dirt bags are hiding among civilians, but let's bomb them anyway."
Darkhorse wrote: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:09 pmWhen some un-named source makes claims to uneducated biased reporters before the Military sorts things out and you think everything you read is accurate your an idiot!
Reporters that work for some of the top, most respected news services in the world are "uneducated" and "biased"?
Really?

Re: So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 6:46 pm
by callmeslick
note, also, Res, that not one member of the Lie Machine has cited some significant gain from this clusterfuck. Wait until he sends the Army into Mexico or Iran. Frankly, I almost would love to see how the Mexico thing works, as that is the precise sort of mission our armed forces were NOT designed to do. Darkhorse will no doubt disagree, based on experience.

Re: So, Pud .....

Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2017 11:22 pm
by Pudfark
DH nailed it. You other two are the board/bored. Grow the fuck up, or Grow the fuck down. I'm thinking a dirt nap for ya both...that way your kids will have a chance/opportunity...without the two of you fecking it up. 8-)