Page 1 of 2

not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 11:44 am
by callmeslick
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/ ... li=BBnbcA1


when you have to describe the Women's March in DC as a 'riot', you should be turning in your badge, Sheriff. Oh, you poor sensitive souls....never saw THIS coming, did you?

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:10 pm
by Darkhorse
I would never describe it as a "Women's March" when half of the women of the Nation are excluded (by the so called inclusive party) it becomes nothing more than a political anti-Trump march. So what rights do these women think they are losing?

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:20 pm
by callmeslick
rights to determine the control over their bodies. Right to equal pay across the board for equal jobs. Right to not be discriminated against by health insurance(pre-ACA), etc.......not a woman, so I am not going to be up to speed. By no means was any segment of American women excluded. I know a busload of Republcan women from here who went. I know a group of pro-life women from Utah who went and were welcomed as sisters. Running a little scared, DH, or just puzzled?

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:23 pm
by callmeslick
do you have any input for inclusion at the March for Science, before I descend into a weekend of steering committee conferences? I'm serious, because I've been pretty much on a soapbox in the inner circle over inclusion. I want the march to be about reminding the skeptical of the value of science, the primacy of proven facts, the value to society of research without pre-conceptions or limits on publication and exchange of data and results, and so on. I don't wish to participate in some effort where it in ANY way comes off as, We're Smart and You're Stupid for supporting the other side. At all.

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:57 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:20 pm rights to determine the control over their bodies. Right to equal pay across the board for equal jobs. Running a little scared, DH, or just puzzled?
Mark me down as puzzled....what a way to start an explain? Sounds like yer promoting prostitution. :roll:
or whining, again, cuz ya don't know what yer talking about? :roll:

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:03 pm
by Pudfark
callmeslick wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:23 pm do you have any input for inclusion at the March for Science, before I descend into a weekend of steering committee conferences? I'm serious, because I've been pretty much on a soapbox in the inner circle over inclusion. I want the march to be about reminding the skeptical of the value of science, the primacy of proven facts, the value to society of research without pre-conceptions or limits on publication and exchange of data and results, and so on. I don't wish to participate in some effort where it in ANY way comes off as, We're Smart and You're Stupid for supporting the other side. At all.
Just saying in a nice way.....all you brought to the 'table' is "pre-conceptions".
Now saying, flat out, this is all 'back burner' BS....weigh/way down the list of things.....to do.

Old Pudfark sez: " Where was all this crap the last eight years.... ;) "

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:36 pm
by Darkhorse
callmeslick wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:20 pmRunning a little scared, DH, or just puzzled?
I am puzzled by the above question!
Show me where rights are being taken form someone.

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:47 pm
by Reservoir_Dog
Pudfark wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 2:57 pmMark me down as puzzled...
We did that about 8 years ago.

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:52 pm
by Darkhorse
callmeslick wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:23 pm do you have any input for inclusion at the March for Science, before I descend into a weekend of steering committee conferences? I'm serious, because I've been pretty much on a soapbox in the inner circle over inclusion. I want the march to be about reminding the skeptical of the value of science, the primacy of proven facts, the value to society of research without pre-conceptions or limits on publication and exchange of data and results, and so on. I don't wish to participate in some effort where it in ANY way comes off as, We're Smart and You're Stupid for supporting the other side. At all.
At this stage of the game I do not see any attack on science, I see a new administration trying to get a handle on an out of control government.

Re: not quite the turnabout they expected

Posted: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:52 pm
by callmeslick
Darkhorse wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 3:36 pm
callmeslick wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2017 12:20 pmRunning a little scared, DH, or just puzzled?
I am puzzled by the above question!
Show me where rights are being taken form someone.
dude, I listed the issues. Whether you view them as 'rights' issues is legitimate, but, like the abortion issue, likely not a male decision to make.