A Complete Waste of Space

http://www.radicaltruth.net/index.php/l ... rica-first

We all are pretty sure that
after the people arrived during the last ice age
there were the Polynesians and Europeans, but Muzzies?

NAH. Pure bullshit.

We are pretty sure that Polynesians were arriving in scattered groups
for perhaps a thousand or more years.

The Norse left hard evidence they were here about 1000 years ago.

The Portugese were visiting (fishing only it seams) before the crazy Italian Cristoforo Colombo.

Now the Muzzies are trying to stake their claim via their only means available, utter bullshit.

If those assholes had been here I think native North American culture would have appeared a bit different.

Well I find it pretty unlikely considering the fact that the Wu & Yüeh city states from China traded with native americans from about 800BC to about 333BC. The Han resumed trading with America about 200BC. Some vietnamese folk I can't recall did the transpacific trading in between?

Nic

nicolas10 wrote:Well I find it pretty unlikely considering the fact that the Wu & Yüeh city states from China traded with native americans from about 800BC to about 333BC. The Han resumed trading with America about 200BC. Some vietnamese folk I can't recall did the transpacific trading in between?

Nic

Quiet down. You'll piss off the Euro folk who think they discovered America.

nicolas10 wrote:Well I find it pretty unlikely considering the fact that the Wu & Yüeh city states from China traded with native americans from about 800BC to about 333BC. The Han resumed trading with America about 200BC. Some vietnamese folk I can't recall did the transpacific trading in between?

Nic

The Chinese claim is potentially valid, but so far no hard evidence has been found.
Given that the Chinese had huge seafaring Junks long before the Euro's had large
ships I tend to believe they made it here. But so far no trace of them has been found.

As to the Muzzies there is only lies, Obama RD and Callmeshit.....

HappyHappy wrote:

nicolas10 wrote:Well I find it pretty unlikely considering the fact that the Wu & Yüeh city states from China traded with native americans from about 800BC to about 333BC. The Han resumed trading with America about 200BC. Some vietnamese folk I can't recall did the transpacific trading in between?

Nic

The Chinese claim is potentially valid, but so far no hard evidence has been found.
Given that the Chinese had huge seafaring Junks long before the Euro's had large
ships I tend to believe they made it here. But so far no trace of them has been found.

As to the Muzzies there is only lies, Obama RD and Callmeshit.....

Nappy still hasn't discovered that screen resolutions can go beyond 200 x 200.

HappyHappy wrote:The Chinese claim is potentially valid, but so far no hard evidence has been found.

Since when do the Chinese need hard proof

fatman wrote:

HappyHappy wrote:The Chinese claim is potentially valid, but so far no hard evidence has been found.

Since when do the Chinese need hard proof

Good point fatman....
"Since, the Russians needed....'hard proof'..."