A Complete Waste of Space

Pudfark wrote:I see again, your comprehension skills have been challenged.

I didn't say media, goofy

mafia, I realize, but didn't go back and correct it. Still, Soros doesn't figure in anything beyond Conservative wet-dreams.

actually, your link makes it clear.......Obama had student loans. Those nitwits were trying to get records of the payment schedule between 2007 and 2009, so it's a moot point that he indeed HAD student loans. I have to prove nothing, you did it for me.

callmeslick wrote:actually, your link makes it clear.......Obama had student loans. Those nitwits were trying to get records of the payment schedule between 2007 and 2009, so it's a moot point that he indeed HAD student loans. I have to prove nothing, you did it for me.

Well.........if, it's a moot point?
Why would you bring it up?
Further on that there point, you're saying that those loans paid for
his entire education and living expenses? Right? So, what did those loans total?

Why aren't those "loans" public?
What's yer boy hiding or hiding from?
Most likely, yer just guessing..............again.

Pudfark wrote:Well.........if, it's a moot point?
Why would you bring it up?

I didn't. You did, if you read back, when you tried to infer that someone paid his way through college.

Further on that there point, you're saying that those loans paid for
his entire education and living expenses? Right? So, what did those loans total?

likely close to $150,000 or so, usually, most people qualify for around $20,000 in grants. BTW, Michelle had equivalent amounts of debt, and they didn't pay the whole nut off until both were in their 40's.

Why aren't those "loans" public?

since when are loans public record?

What's yer boy hiding or hiding from?
Most likely, yer just guessing..............again.

nope, once again you are showing less than the deserved respect to your elected President. There is nothing amiss, but you like to toss around 'suspicion' with utterly no proof. How would you like it if that were the way you were treated, routinely and publicly?

oh, and Pud, a link to loophole costs to the nation....you'll like it, it's a Fox(Business) Link:
http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-fin ... avor-rich/
these five alone equal 200 billion per year, and they don't even touch on some real doozies that will double that ticket. So, no centuries, not even a decade. In fact, if plugged into the 10 year timeframe of the bill that caused the sequester, you would have gotten 4 Trillion of the savings.

"since when were student loans public record?" Since you said they were "student loans. It's public record."

Hard to keep up...ain't it.

You bring up these "facts" and then ya refute them...it's a tickle.

callmeslick wrote:oh, and Pud, a link to loophole costs to the nation....you'll like it, it's a Fox(Business) Link:
http://www.foxbusiness.com/personal-fin ... avor-rich/
these five alone equal 200 billion per year, and they don't even touch on some real doozies that will double that ticket. So, no centuries, not even a decade. In fact, if plugged into the 10 year timeframe of the bill that caused the sequester, you would have gotten 4 Trillion of the savings.

Total Bullshit, again...
At your Presidents current rate of spending?
There is no saving of anything....
Cute effort on your part.

student loans to individuals are not public records.


I gave you the facts on loopholes and you come up with, what, exactly, to dispute the numbers? Oh, yes, nothing, again.

Seriously Slick....
Really don't throw out something as a fact and then refute it a couple of posts
later...then get yer panties in a wad....when it's pointed out to ya...

What I came up with?
Was what you carelessly threw out...
Ate.
Then tried to take a dump.
It don't work that way...

Though...keep trying, in the "right" way.

Old Pudfark sez: " You go "left" so much...ya oughta be in NASCAR "