Page 6 of 12
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:37 pm
by CUDA
there are 4 explanations
1. it turns out he's lucky and the Grand Jury finds it's justified
2. he's just a forum troll
3. he's a racist SOB that feels it really is justifiable to kill an UN-armed black man
4. he's incapable of making an unbiased decision and he feels killing anyone that fits the profile of a Democrat is justified

Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:43 pm
by nicolas10
fatman wrote:nicolas10 wrote:The guy chased Martin after being instructed not to, which means that HE provoked the situation which led to the fight, which led to the death of Martin.
Well how about Martin running one generally doesnt flee with out cause because they are up to no good, so that by its self would justify a pursuit.
Why not just shoot him in the back while you're at it?
Nic
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 6:54 pm
by CUDA
Possible cause for Martin Running
STOP OR I"LL SHOOT
I'm not saying it happened, just a possible scenario
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:19 pm
by fatman
nicolas10 wrote:fatman wrote:nicolas10 wrote:The guy chased Martin after being instructed not to, which means that HE provoked the situation which led to the fight, which led to the death of Martin.
Well how about Martin running one generally doesnt flee with out cause because they are up to no good, so that by its self would justify a pursuit.
Why not just shoot him in the back while you're at it?
Nic
Thats not the point bud its that you are already planting all the blame on the shooter im just saying it might not be the case
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:08 pm
by Pudfark
I'm saying that Fats has a good point...it may very well not be anything like what folks have fabricated in their minds or factored into their opinions and freely shared with righteous indignation to all. Soapy pointed out earlier that the forensic evidence has not been introduced. Zimmerman was a "volunteer" who had no training or experience in what he was attempting to do for his neighbors. The result of his actions are really not that surprising to me. The human nature of "jumping to conclusions" is the most evident fact, thus far presented.
Should a grand jury indict Zimmerman? Do you think/know, that he deserves a fair and impartial trial?
Hell....I'll go on the record for what is known at this time? "Zimmerman will never get convicted".
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:09 am
by HappyHappy
No crime means no trial.
If the people of Florida do not like it then CHANGE THE LAW.
It is that simple people!
There was no crime in the eyes of the Florida justice system.
In case you bleeding hearts have not figured it out, there
is never such a thing as an un armed man. That "kid" could
have killed Zimmerman with his bare hands.
I do not see this as the tragic death of an unarmed Black kid.
I see it as the death of an impulsive dangerous punk.
As a man with recent Black ancestors I qualified to call this as i see it.
No racisim here.
Cuda you are a closet liberal whine bag.
HH
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:23 am
by CUDA
HappyHappy wrote:Cuda you are a closet liberal whine bag.
HH
I thought you had me an Soapy on Ignore. another lie??
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Sun Apr 01, 2012 3:38 pm
by Soapy
CUDA wrote:HappyHappy wrote:Cuda you are a closet liberal whine bag.
HH
I thought you had me an Soapy on Ignore. another lie??

The guy has no idea how to ignore. I think he has a special alert buzzer though

Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 7:06 am
by fatman
Well it seems that there has been some word play by the media
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/nb ... 6318992043
Re: TRAYVON MARTIN SHOOTING
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 10:36 am
by Pudfark
You right about that Fats.....seems the rush to judgement folks, now have a waning interest.
They got their misconstrued, misrepresented five minute handjob out of it....and are now reposing
in their refractory time out. Makes decent folks wonder? Really, who is the racist in all of this?