Page 3 of 5
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 4:12 pm
by Pudfark
Darkhorse wrote:
There is definitely a need but as I have said before this Country is headed straight down the shitter.
Just sayin' Slick believes he's "
on top of it" so he's all for "full speed" ahead/a head.
Old Pudfark sez: " Slick don't care where he takes a dump...as long as he don't have to put up with no shit.... "
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 7:14 pm
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:"
One Nation under God".....that's why.

not in the original documents, sorry.
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Tue May 06, 2014 8:34 pm
by Pudfark
Never said it was....

It's in the "Pledge of Allegiance"...something, I'm sure, you never recited.

Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:04 am
by nicolas10
callmeslick wrote:...interesting, both of YOUR suggested images are sick derivations of Christianity.
What a load of crap. Hitler was a pagan.
Nic
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:19 am
by nicolas10
BTW this is why the socialist traitors that govern most european (& the US) governments use every means at their disposal to increase immigration of people with differing cultures. The goal is to attack the people's cultures by dilluting it, or by "recognising" that new populations will be offended by the original culture (case in point, slick equating the statue of the baphomet's offensive potential to a christian statue's offensive potential to some muslums).
That's how the anti-christian masonic/satanic crowd has been attacking christianity for centuries.
It's ok, people like slick will find a way to benefit from the religious wars that are going to erupt at some point.
Nic
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:20 am
by callmeslick
Pudfark wrote:Never said it was....

It's in the "Pledge of Allegiance"...something, I'm sure, you never recited.

it was added in 1957, and never in the original wording. Look it up. It was a knee-jerk, stupid, response to fear of 'godless Communists' and frankly, should be removed from the Pledge.
What's odd is this position is seen as 'liberal'. It's one of those things that I am in complete agreement with my Dad. My Dad is NEVER going to be seen as 'liberal'....he is 93 years old, veteran of WWII, made it through the Depression. However, he is staunch about separation of Church and State, and has spent some time and money supporting those that agree when they run for office. He is a member of two groups who also are strongly opposed to the intermingling of religion and state, the Masons and the SAR(I'm in that last one). Neither is a 'liberal' organization.
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:21 am
by callmeslick
nicolas10 wrote:callmeslick wrote:...interesting, both of YOUR suggested images are sick derivations of Christianity.
What a load of crap. Hitler was a pagan.
Nic
no he wasn't. And there is much reference to Christianity in Nazi literature.
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 7:22 am
by callmeslick
nicolas10 wrote:BTW this is why the socialist traitors that govern most european (& the US) governments use every means at their disposal to increase immigration of people with differing cultures. The goal is to attack the people's cultures by dilluting it, or by "recognising" that new populations will be offended by the original culture (case in point, slick equating the statue of the baphomet's offensive potential to a christian statue's offensive potential to some muslums).
That's how the anti-christian masonic/satanic crowd has been attacking christianity for centuries.
It's ok, people like slick will find a way to benefit from the religious wars that are going to erupt at some point.
Nic
religious wars only get caused by assholes worried about things like 'diluting' the culture and the like......
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 9:45 am
by nicolas10
lol nazi litterature.
yea yea.
Re: Well, this could get interesting.
Posted: Wed May 07, 2014 10:59 am
by Darkhorse
callmeslick wrote:What's odd is this position is seen as 'liberal'. It's one of those things that I am in complete agreement with my Dad. My Dad is NEVER going to be seen as 'liberal'....he is 93 years old, veteran of WWII, made it through the Depression. However, he is staunch about separation of Church and State, and has spent some time and money supporting those that agree when they run for office. He is a member of two groups who also are strongly opposed to the intermingling of religion and state, the Masons and the SAR(I'm in that last one). Neither is a 'liberal' organization.
I do not know anyone that wants a State sponsored Church; nothing good can come of it. With this country being mostly Judeo-Christian throughout its history and most of the Government structure founded on their principles putting reminders up around does not create a sponsored religion. All this PC crap that is flooding this country is not doing anything good for anybody.