A Complete Waste of Space

I'd say slick is more of a trotskist than a stalinist.

Nic

callmeslick wrote:definition:Political theory advocating community ownership of all property, the benefits of which are to be shared by all according to the needs of each
(Merriam-Webster dictionary)


now, find where I ever advocated this. Get to work now, Pud and Slappy. I dare you.


Oh, and without posting further definitions, suffice it to say that the definition of facism is exactly opposed to Communism, except both rely on a dictatorship(one of the workers, one of the political right wing). Thus, NO ONE can be fascist AND communist, by definition.

One might think in summarizing your posts over the years, and therefore guessing what your thoughts are, that you are a hard core liberal that only supports conservatism when it best suits you.
Does that not roughly define communism minimally at the leadership levels?

p.s. you misspelled fascism in your excitement.

OMG! BAAD SPELLINK!

HH

Dawg wrote:One might think in summarizing your posts over the years, and therefore guessing what your thoughts are, that you are a hard core liberal that only supports conservatism when it best suits you.

not quite. I'm a liberal leaning moderate.

Does that not roughly define communism minimally at the leadership levels?

not really. At all.

p.s. you misspelled fascism in your excitement.

as Nic would say, 'C'est la vie'.

Now, to Dawg(by way of followup): What do you feel makes me 'hard core liberal'? I mean, I am not for overreach in social welfare programs, I am hardly a pacifist, I am a strong advocate of the value of corporations in a modern economy, I basically get called 'right winger' by extreme leftists, and 'left winger' by extremist righties. That status quo suits me fine, and explains my strong support of Obama(another pragmatic type). I like a guy who gets vilified by the extremists on both sides. Likely explains why he won both national elections, as well..........
At any rate, the ONLY thng I've ever advocated for here that strikes me as 'uber liberal' in some folks' eyes is Cradle to Grave Medicare. And, even on that one, my reasoning is as much around benefits to the economy by freeing corporations from the unknown of medical insurance pricing, and optimizing the workforce by not having people tied to jobs and locales they don't wish to be in merely due to the need for health care. Otherwise, my world view(global, but not the US' responsibity to police), my view of fiscal balance(match taxes to needed programs, not slash and burn), my view of tightly regulated capitalism and my view of personal responsibility(which for me extends to childrearing and gun ownership alike), are pretty much 1955 GOP positions. In other words, very traditional, moderate and leaning conservative, but with an eye towards long-term goals for the nation and the society(gasp!! Progressive thinking!).

HappyHappy wrote:Naturaly Callmeshit's pet Chimp chimes in

HH

You're always quite amusing when you pull that one out of your hat.
Let me ask you something, Slappy.
If agreeing with Slick on certain things makes me Slick's "pet chimp" ...... then by YOUR OWN LOGIC does that not make YOU Pud's "pet chimp" because you agree with Pud.

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

HappyHappy wrote:Naturaly Callmeshit's pet Chimp chimes in

HH

You're always quite amusing when you pull that one out of your hat.
Let me ask you something, Slappy.
If agreeing with Slick on certain things makes me Slick's "pet chimp" ...... then by YOUR OWN LOGIC does that not make YOU Pud's "pet chimp" because you agree with Pud.

HH don't have a rope around his neck and he don't dance to the organ grinder like you do...HH is capable of independent thought and you as a Canadian are dependent on damn near everything. That, said....I don't really think of you as a monkey...other'n than when yer playin' with yer turd. Yer more like a caboose on a train...ya think yer pushing? When all along, yer being pulled.

Pudfark wrote:HH is capable of independent thought

Pudfark wrote:you as a Canadian are dependent on damn near everything.

Really? Like what?
If I'm dependent on damn near everything why do I get up and go to work every morning?

Reservoir_Dog wrote:

Pudfark wrote:HH is capable of independent thought

Pudfark wrote:you as a Canadian are dependent on damn near everything.

Really? Like what?
If I'm dependent on damn near everything why do I get up and go to work every morning?

Because you're told...to..too. Me? I don't have to work anymore...told or not.
Fodder for yer thoughts....maybe, if'n ya Canookians could take total care of yerselves.....you'd have a dab more pride...in yerselves and yer country? eh..?

Pudfark wrote:Because you're told...to..too. Me? I don't have to work anymore...told or not.
Fodder for yer thoughts....maybe, if'n ya Canookians could take total care of yerselves.....you'd have a dab more pride...in yerselves and yer country? eh..?

Fuck, you're stupid.