Zimmerman trial
Re: Zimmerman trial
Like I said earlier, that's the purpose.
Edit: Now I get it.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/ ... y-Movement
Edit: Now I get it.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/ ... y-Movement
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Zimmerman trial
Breitbart=Serial Lie Site
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Zimmerman trial
no better description of Breitbart that is Work Suitable.
Re: Zimmerman trial
Please, at your leisure and convenience....present proof.callmeslick wrote:Breitbart=Serial Lie Site
- callmeslick
- Posts: 16473
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:02 pm
- Location: Fearing and loathing in Delaware and Virginia.
Re: Zimmerman trial
don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
Re: Zimmerman trial
callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
Not as low as yours, note your comment preserved in my sig below.
HH
-
- Posts: 1384
- Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
- Location: The lone Conservative voice in the Liberal Bastion of Portland Oregon
Re: Zimmerman trial
So you make a blanket statement slamming the credibility of an organization, yet don't have time to back it up with facts.callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
Isnt that the definition of libel?
"In reality, there exists only fact and fiction.
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Opinions result from a lack of the former and a reliance on the latter."
Re: Zimmerman trial
Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.callmeslick wrote:don't have that sort of time, but essentially anyone who wishes to go through the past 8 years of Breitbart claims will find an extremely low accuracy rate.
Your quote above does fit the implied criteria here in the "Frivolous Rambling" arena.
- Reservoir_Dog
- Posts: 8858
- Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 3:46 pm
- Location: Kicking and a' gouging in the mud and the blood and the beer.
Re: Zimmerman trial
Pudfark wrote:Everything, totally, I've written on these forums, I've backed up, all of it.
Pudfark wrote:It's old news and it was political in the sense that it was used to obscure other news. In short, it was a smoke screen that served it's purpose then. To resurrect it now?
Would be to renew it's original purpose. My opinion.