Nice car Ruggie

[Wullie]

e careful what you wish for. There are far more dangerous fates than having a middle-of-the-road, soft spoken intellectual for a leader and a bunch of folks with no real political courage in Congress. Do we need change in the country? Yes. But that change has to be long term and demands serious sacrifice from everyone. The path you espouse will lead to anarchy and ultimately to some kind of regressive regime.

Your soft spoken intellectual is a commie in black face. He hates this country and everything it has ever stood for. He was bought and paid for and is the mouthpiece for the socialist agenda his friends and your friends want to give us. He, along with all his friends are what and who we need watch and need CHANGE away from.

It is my opinion that his radical changes will lead this country down the road to anarchy with a rocket in its' ass. When that happens (and I HOPE and PRAY) that it never does, they plan to drag us out of the darkness with chains around our necks.

[callmeslick]

It is my opinion that his radical changes will lead this country down the road to anarchy with a rocket in its' ass..

most, if not all, on the left would ask,"What radical changes?"

[Wullie]

Get your head out of your ass and look at what the DEMOCRAT controlled Congress under Pelosi has done to the deficit since 2007. Blame that on Bush?

Your new HEALTH CARE?

CAP and TRADE?

Immigration reform?

Let's see what happens when the lame ducks make their last squawk on the way out and see what else they try to shove up our ass.

Hell, the press is even predicting the Dems losing one or both houses.

Just because you refuse to see it, doesn't mean it is not there.

[Pudfark]

It is my opinion that his radical changes will lead this country down the road to anarchy with a rocket in its' ass..

most, if not all, on the left would ask,"What radical changes?"

That's an easy one.......The one's coming this fall....

Old Pudfark sez: " This change ain't gonna be transparent.... "

[callmeslick]

Get your head out of your ass and look at what the DEMOCRAT controlled Congress under Pelosi has done to the deficit since 2007. Blame that on Bush?

of course not. But, I asked you, Wullie, radical change? Hardly. Bush cut taxes, started two wars and passed a medicare drug benefit. Total hit to deficit: over 5 trillion bucks. Obama has continued the pattern. Where's the radical change?

Your new HEALTH CARE?

which, is pretty damn close to the Healthcare packaged promoted by Newt Gingrich(famed liberal, and IMHO the smartest damned Conservative out there) in 1995. Also, the plan modelled pretty close to the Massachusetts plan endorsed and signed into law by noted Progressive, Mitt Romney. Radical change?
hardly......

CAP and TRADE?

What? Cap and Trade passed Congress and Obama signed it? Who knew. No change to date that I'm aware of......

Immigration reform?

pretty much supporting the exact position of left-wing activist John McCain.

Hell, the press is even predicting the Dems losing one or both houses.

Just because you refuse to see it, doesn't mean it is not there.

Should you decide, sometime, to actually study the history of your own nation, and specifically, the Political History, you'll find that often happens, no matter what the details of the day are. No big deal, good Presidents overcome it most of the time. Time will tell.

But, please, no one ought to protest the 'radical changes' in our nation, because there aren't any. And, if one reads closely the polling data, something emerges....a nice chunk of the popularity downturn for Obama comes from disenchanted liberal types, who have even less patience than you wingnuts on the right. They see utterly no change and they're pissed. Good for your side, shortrun. Long-term?? I see the GOP, at least, sowing the seeds for their complete demise within 10 or 12 years. We'll see, there too, in the longterm....

[Wullie]

Slick, it appears that you have anoxia from your so high and mighty seat in your ivory tower.

Drink some more gin and tonics.

[GOYA]

You are all idiots.

Just saying.

Who was the better leader? Stalin or Hitler?

It's rhetorical.

[Pudfark]

Goya, I would have to say....Hitler, he didn't last as long.

[callmeslick]

Slick, it appears that you have anoxia from your so high and mighty seat in your ivory tower.

Drink some more gin and tonics.

sucks to have your argument blow up in your face, huh, big guy?

[Wullie]

You mention all the debt that Bush ran up. I recall that it REALLY started going through the roof AFTER the Dems took over both houses.

As for two wars? I also recall all the present day Democrat naysayers were on board when he tossed our shit in the fan.

I'll wait and see my argument blow up in your face when the lame ducks shove more of their radical socialist agenda down our throats.

Thanks to "forward" thinking people like you, they will have that capability for a couple of months after they get their pink slips.